Operating manual

The client creative SOP

How to onboard a client brand, run the review loop, and keep several brands separate when one person is producing for all of them.

16 min read, built to be copied into your own docsFor AgenciesUpdated 2026-09-16

What is inside

  • A 10-step onboarding SOP from kickoff call to first approved asset
  • A 15-field client creative brief template with what a good answer looks like
  • A 10-point brand separation checklist for one operator running many brands
  • A deliverable menu with turnarounds and what actually drives the cost
  • 12 client-facing lines for scope creep, claims, disclosure and late approvals

The client work is not the creative, it is the context

Anyone can make an ad. What makes multi-brand creative hard is that every brand needs a different truth held in someone's head, and that the person holding it is usually also the person producing, invoicing and answering the 9pm message about a headline.

The failures are boringly consistent. A claim goes out that the client's legal team rejected two months ago and nobody wrote down. Brand A's tone shows up in brand B's script. A revision round that was supposed to be one round becomes five because three people were quietly added to the thread. A project is delivered, the client loves it, and six months later nobody can find the source files or remember which version was approved.

None of that is a creative problem. It is an operating problem, and it is solved with the same four things every time: a written brief that states what you may and may not say, one named decision-maker, hard separation between brands, and a review loop with a defined end.

This is the SOP. Take it, rename it, put your own logo on it, and make it the thing you send before the kickoff call rather than the thing you write after the first argument.

Onboarding a new client brand, kickoff to first approved asset

The goal of onboarding is not to start producing quickly. It is to reach the point where you can produce without asking a question, and where a disagreement about output can be settled by pointing at a document. Budget a week of calendar time, most of which is you waiting on them.

  1. 1

    1. Read everything public before the call

    Their site, their store or app listing, their last thirty social posts, their reviews, their press, and their two most visible competitors. Come to the kickoff with a draft of what you think their positioning is. Never start with a blank page in front of a client: a wrong draft gets corrected in five minutes, a blank page takes an hour and produces adjectives. Never start without: at least one honest look at what their existing creative already does.

  2. 2

    2. Run the kickoff against the brief template, not a conversation

    One hour, screen shared, the brief template open, filling fields live. A conversation produces vibes; a form produces answers you can cite later. Record it with permission and keep the recording with the brief. Never start without: the person on the call being the one who can actually approve work, or being able to name who is.

  3. 3

    3. Get the claims list and the no-go list in writing

    Two short lists. What you may say about this product, and what you may never say, including anything their legal team has already struck, competitor comparisons, health or financial outcomes, and words the founder hates. These are the two fields clients skip and the two that cause every genuinely expensive problem. Never start without: both lists, in writing, from a named person.

  4. 4

    4. Build the brand context and make them look at it

    Turn the source (website, storefront, App Store or Play listing) into a saved brand record: identity, palette, fonts, logo, imagery, product catalog, tone. Then show it to the client before you produce anything. It takes ten minutes and it catches the wrong logo variant, the retired palette and the product they stopped selling, all of which are cheap now and expensive after you have made twenty assets. Never start without: the client confirming the palette, the logo file and the product list are current.

  5. 5

    5. Collect assets and, separately, the rights to them

    Product photography, brand fonts, the logo in vector, any existing video, and the customer photos or testimonials they want used. For every item ask one question: do you have the right to use this, and does that right extend to paid ads. Licensed stock, a photographer's limited-use images and an employee's face are three different answers. Never start without: written confirmation of usage rights on anything featuring a real person.

  6. 6

    6. Agree the deliverable, the placements and the ratios

    Not 'social content'. Three 4:5 statics and one 9:16 video per month, for these placements, in these languages, delivered as these file types. Ambiguity here becomes free work later, because the client is not being unreasonable when they assume a square version was included. Never start without: the exact output list written into the scope.

  7. 7

    7. Name the decision-maker and the review window in the contract

    One person approves. Everyone else gives input to that person before the round opens. Write the response window into the agreement (two working days is normal) and write down what happens when it lapses: the timeline moves by the same number of days, and the batch is not reopened. Never start without: a named approver and a stated window.

  8. 8

    8. Set the disclosure position before you make anything synthetic

    If any of the work will use AI creators, generated voices or generated imagery, agree it explicitly now and put it in the contract. Agree the label you will use (creator-style or AI-generated), agree that no synthetic person will be presented as a customer, and agree who is responsible for platform disclosure requirements. This conversation is easy before the work exists and very hard after. Never start without: an agreed disclosure line in the contract.

  9. 9

    9. Produce one small thing first, on purpose

    Before the first full batch, make a single asset in the smallest format in scope and send it with a specific question: does this sound like you. You are not testing production, you are testing whether the brief is correct and whether the approver actually approves things. A client who takes nine days to react to one image will not react to twelve in two days. Never start without: one calibration asset approved.

  10. 10

    10. Write the operating agreement and send it once

    One page: what you deliver, when, in what format, who approves, how many rounds, what counts as a new request, how you will handle disclosure, and where the files live. Send it after onboarding, not during the first disagreement. Every difficult conversation in this document becomes easy if you can answer it by quoting a page they already agreed to. Never start without: it being sent and acknowledged.

The client creative brief template

Fifteen fields. Fill them live on the kickoff call. The third column exists because clients answer these fields badly by default, and a bad answer that goes unchallenged is a revision round you will pay for later. If a field cannot be answered, that is information: write down who can answer it and when.

FieldWhy it mattersWhat a good answer looks like
Product truthEverything downstream is a claim about this. If the product description is vague, every piece of copy will be vague or invented.What it physically is, what it does, how it is used, what is in the box or the plan, and the one thing it does better than the obvious alternative. Specific enough that someone who has never seen it could describe it correctly.
Who it is forAn audience defined by demographics produces creative aimed at nobody. An audience defined by a situation produces a hook.The moment someone realises they need this, in their words. 'Parents of newborns at 3am' rather than 'women 25 to 40'. Include who it is explicitly not for.
The job it replacesPeople switch from something, not from nothing. The thing being replaced is where the angle lives.What they did before this existed, including 'nothing' and 'a spreadsheet'. Name the actual alternative, not the category.
Claims you may makeThis is the boundary of everything you are allowed to write. Without it you are guessing, and the client is reviewing your guesses.A short list of approved sentences, with the source for each: a spec, a study, a certification, a genuine review. If a claim has no source, it is not on the list.
Claims you may not makeUsually longer and more useful than the approved list. This is where past legal decisions live, and they are almost never volunteered.Explicit prohibitions: outcome promises, medical or financial language, competitor comparisons, superlatives, anything a regulator has already queried, and anything the founder considers off-brand.
Proof and evidenceThe difference between a claim that survives review and one that gets cut is whether you can point at where it came from.Reviews you may quote and where, named customers you may reference, test results, certifications, awards, and who holds the source documents.
CompetitorsYou need to know both who they compare themselves to and which names you are forbidden from putting on screen.Two or three named competitors, what the client believes the real difference is, and an explicit rule on naming them in creative. Logos are a separate permission from names.
Tone of voice'Friendly but professional' means nothing. Tone is only usable when expressed as constraints.Three sentences the brand would write and three it would never write. Contractions or not, humour or not, exclamation marks or not, first person plural or singular.
No-go listEvery brand has visual and verbal landmines that are obvious internally and invisible to you.Banned words, retired taglines, a colour that belongs to a discontinued line, an old logo variant still circulating, imagery the founder dislikes, categories they will not appear next to.
Legal and regulatory reviewWhether creative needs a legal pass changes your timeline more than any production decision.Who reviews, what triggers a review, how long it takes, and whether it happens at concept stage or at final asset. Get this before you quote a turnaround.
AI disclosure stanceIf you will use generated imagery, voices or creators, it needs to be agreed in advance and written down.Whether AI-generated creative is permitted, the wording they want used, whether synthetic creators are allowed at all, and who owns compliance with platform disclosure rules.
Channels and placementsPlacement decides ratio, safe zones, length and how much text can live on the frame. Deciding it late means remaking things.The exact placements, with ratios and any platform-specific text limits, plus which are paid and which are organic. Paid and organic are different creative jobs.
Existing assets and rightsHalf the delivery problems in client work are rights problems discovered after production.An inventory with a rights answer per item: owned, licensed with limits, or unclear. Anything featuring a real person needs explicit written permission for paid usage.
Delivery format'Send me the files' turns into three follow-up messages and a re-export every single time.File types, resolutions, naming convention, where they are delivered, and who else gets access. Include whether they need editable source or final files only.
Approval chainThe single largest cause of revision spirals is an approver who is not actually the approver.One named person who approves, everyone who gives input to them, the response window, and what happens when it is missed. Written into the agreement, not agreed verbally.
6 more sections

Read the rest free.

A free Advibly account unlocks the full document and the download. No card needed, and you get 2 credits to try it on your own product.

What you unlock

  • A 10-step onboarding SOP from kickoff call to first approved asset
  • A 15-field client creative brief template with what a good answer looks like
  • A 10-point brand separation checklist for one operator running many brands
  • A deliverable menu with turnarounds and what actually drives the cost
  • 12 client-facing lines for scope creep, claims, disclosure and late approvals

Free to start. See what a paid plan adds

Run every client brand from one workspace

A separate saved brand context per client, no bleed between them, and the exact credit cost shown before every generation. Up to 5 brands on Publish, and unlimited brands on Studio.

See the plans

Questions about this one

Four things: a written claims list, a written no-go list, one named decision-maker, and confirmation of usage rights on anything featuring a real person. Everything else can be corrected mid-project. Those four cannot, and each one of them is where the genuinely expensive problems come from.
Define the end before the start. One named decision-maker, concept approved before production, one consolidated round per batch, a written list of what counts as in-scope revision versus new work, and an explicit line closing each round. Most scope creep enters through rounds nobody ever formally closed.
The limiting factor is not production capacity, it is how many distinct brand voices and claims lists one person can hold without bleed. Past roughly five, the setup has to change: voice notes written down rather than remembered, a named owner per client, and a handover pack kept current as you go.
Yes, and put it in the contract rather than the kickoff chat. Generated people are described as creator-style, UGC-style or AI-generated, and are never presented as genuine customer testimonials. Agree who is responsible for any platform disclosure the client's channels require while the work does not exist yet, because it is a much harder conversation afterwards.
A separate saved brand context per client, with its own palette, fonts, tone, product list and claims, and no shared record between two clients in the same category. In Advibly that maps to brand limits: 1 brand on Create, up to 5 on Publish, and unlimited brands on Studio, with separate context per brand.
Publish the menu and the cost drivers, not the numbers. When a client understands that concept count, ratio count, runtime and the number of approvers are what move the price, they negotiate the scope instead of the rate, which is a much better conversation for both sides.